A Brief Sample of Archaeology Corroborating the Claims of the New Testament

WHAT THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD SHOWS

Sir William Mitchell Ramsay, a 19th-century English historian and prolific writer, held a pervasive anti-biblical bias. He believed the historical accounts in the Book of Acts were written

in the mid-second century. Ramsay was skeptical of Luke’s authorship and the historicity of the Book of Acts, and he set out to prove his suspicions. He began a detailed study of the archaeological evidence, and eventually came to an illuminating conclusion: The historical and archaeological evidence supported Luke’s first-century authorship and historical reliability.

(There are) reasons for placing the author of Acts among the historians of the first rank. —Sir William Ramsay, “St. Paul the Traveler and Roman Citizen,” p. 4.

Ramsay became convinced of Luke’s reliability based on the latter’s accurate description of historical events and settings. Ramsay wasn’t the only scholar to be impressed by Luke’s accuracy:

One of the most remarkable tokens of (Luke’s) accuracy is his sure familiarity with the proper titles of all the notable persons who are mentioned. . . . Cyprus, for example, which was an imperial province until 22 BC, became a senatorial province in that year, and was therefore governed no longer by an imperial legate but by a proconsul. And so, when Paul and Barnabas arrived in Cyprus about AD 47, it was the proconsul Sergius Paullus whom they met . . . —F.F. Bruce, “The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable?” p. 82

Luke’s narratives include detailed and specific descriptions related to the locations, people, offices and titles within the Roman Empire. In fact, many of Luke’s claims were eventually confirmed by archaeological discoveries:

  • Related to Quirinius
    Luke wrote that Joseph and Mary returned to Bethlehem because a Syrian governor named Quirinius was conducting a census (Luke 2:1–3). Archaeological discoveries in the 19th century revealed that Quirinius (or someone with the same name) was also a proconsul of Syria and Cilicia from 11 B.C. to the death of Herod. Quirinius’ name has been discovered on a coin from this period of time, and on the base of a statue erected in Pisidian Antioch.
  • Related to Erastus
    In Romans 16:23, Paul wrote, “Erastus, the city treasurer[,] greets you.” A piece of pavement was discovered in Corinth in 1929 confirming Erastus’ existence.
  • Related to Lysanias
    Luke described a tetrarch named Lysanias and wrote that this man reigned over Abilene when John the Baptist began his ministry (Luke 3:1). Two inscriptions have been discovered that mention Lysanias by name. One of these, dated from A.D. 14 to 37, identifies Lysanias as the tetrarch in Abila near Damascus.
  • Related to Iconium
    In Acts 13:51, Luke described this city in Phyrigia. Some ancient writers (like Cicero) wrote that Iconium was located in Lycaonia, rather than Phyrigia, but a monument was discovered in 1910 that confirmed Iconium as a city in Phyrigia.
  • Related to the Pool of Bethesda
    John wrote about the existence of a pool of Bethesda (John 5:1-9) and said that it was located in the region of Jerusalem, near the Sheep Gate, surrounded by five porticos. In 1888, archaeologists began excavating the area near St. Anne’s Church in Jerusalem and discovered the remains of the pool, complete with steps leading down from one side and five shallow porticos on another side.
  • Related to Politarchs
    For many centuries, Luke was the only ancient writer to use the word “Politarch” to describe “rulers of the city.” Skeptics doubted that it was a legitimate Greek term until 19 inscriptions were discovered. Five of these were in reference to Thessalonica, the very city in which Luke was claiming to have heard the term.
  • Related to the Pool of Siloam
    John wrote about the “Pool of Siloam” (John 9:1-12) and described it as a place of ceremonial cleansing. Archaeologists Ronny Reich and Eli Shukrun excavated the pool and dated it from 100 B.C. to A.D. 100 (based on the features of the pool and coins found in the plaster).
  • Related to Pontius Pilate
    For many years, the only corroboration we had for the existence of Pontius Pilate, the governor of Judea who authorized the crucifixion of Jesus, was a very brief citation by Tacitus. In 1961, however, a piece of limestone was discovered bearing an inscription with Pilate’s name. The inscription was discovered in Caesarea, a provincial capital during Pilate’s term (A.D. 26-36), and it describes a building dedication from Pilate to Tiberius Caesar.
  • Related to the Custom of Crucifixion
    While thousands of condemned criminals and war prisoners were reportedly executed in this manner, not a single one of them had ever been discovered in any archaeological site. In 1968, Vassilios Tzaferis found the first remains of a crucifixion victim, Yohanan Ben Ha’galgol, buried in a proper Jewish “kôkhîmtype” tomb.
  • Related to Sergius Paulus
    In Acts 13, Luke identified Sergius Paulus, a proconsul in Paphos. Skeptics doubted the existence of this man and claimed that any leader of this area would be a “propraetor” rather than a proconsul. But an inscription was discovered at Soli in Cyprus that acknowledged Paulus and identified him as a proconsul.

(For more on these discoveries, please see my book “Cold Case Christianity.”)

In addition to these archaeological discoveries, there are many other details recorded in the Book of Acts corroborating its historical accuracy. Luke describes features of the Roman world corroborated by other non-Christian historians:

  • Luke includes a correct description of two ways to gain Roman citizenship (Acts 22:28).
  • He includes an accurate explanation of provincial penal procedure (Acts 24:1-9).
  • He correctly describes the process of invoking one’s Roman citizenship, including the legal formula, de quibus cognoscere volebam (Acts 25:18).
  • He includes an accurate description of being in Roman custody and the conditions of being imprisoned at one’s own expense (Acts 28:16 and Acts 28:30-31).

Archaeology is a discipline of “fractions.” Given the nature of archaeology, we shouldn’t expect to find corroboration for every claim of history, regardless of historic author. As a detective, I’ve also come to respect and recognize the limits of corroborative evidence. But in spite of the inherent difficulties and limitations of the discipline, the archaeological evidence supporting the claims of the New Testament is incredibly robust (refer to the Biblical Archaeology Society for additional evidence). Archaeology provides us with enough “remarkable tokens of [Luke’s] accuracy” to help us corroborate the history of the New Testament.

Image courtesy of arturbo at iStock by Getty Images.

J. Warner Wallace is a cold-case detective, a Senior Fellow at the Colson Center for Christian Worldview, a Christian Case Maker, and the author of “Cold-Case Christianity,” “Cold-Case Christianity for Kids,” “God’s Crime Scene,” and “Forensic Faith.”

Subscribe to J. Warner’s Daily Email.


Articles on the BreakPoint website are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BreakPoint. Outside links are for informational purposes and do not necessarily imply endorsement of their content.

Comment Policy: Commenters are welcome to argue all points of view, but they are asked to do it civilly and respectfully. Comments that call names, insult other people or groups, use profanity or obscenity, repeat the same points over and over, or make personal remarks about other commenters will be deleted. After multiple infractions, commenters may be banned.

  • Steve03

    This list of archaeological finds proves the accuracy of the Bible to exactly the same degree that finding the charred foundation of a plantation house near Atlanta proves the historicity of Rhett Butler and Scarlet O’Hara.

    • battletoads

      What it proves is that the writers of these books had intimate knowledge of their surroundings. This makes it far more likely that they were written much closer to the events than liberal scholars care to admit.

    • Derek

      It doesn’t prove that the Bible is true. What it does is undercut the notion that the authors of the Bible were temporally removed from the events they reported. If the authors wrote factual claims close to the time of the events they reported, it means their reports can’t be dismissed as mythologising, and you have a hard time explaining why their factual claims weren’t countered by enemy claims or evidence (eg. Producing the body of Christ). This shifts the burden of proof, as we have little reason to doubt the historical claims – as we don’t do this with other similarly accurate historical accounts.

  • Googly Googly

    The Harry Potter book series accurately describes the city of London, therefore, Harry Potter is real and had magical powers.

    • Matt

      J.K. Rowling already knew London existed based on the evidence when she wrote the HP series . What you’re claiming is the opposite to what the author is stating in the article where we have recent evidence for claims from the Bble where there was no physical existence previously, therefore we can trust the Bibles claims.

  • John Clauer

    The discussion on Quirinius is not completely accurate. He was campaigning in Syria as the commander of four Legions. The Stella that identifies him as Proconsul in Syria indicates dates of 11/10 BC to 8 BC. Not a problem if you do not demand a 4 BC birth for Christ.