The Point: Mother or Pregnant Person?

This is loss-of-touch with reality. For the Colson Center for Christian Worldview, I’m John Stonestreet with The Point.

If there’s a human relationship more basic than the relationship of mother and child, I don’t know it. Having a mother is universal. But in this age of sexual chaos, even this is being decried as too exclusive.

New guidelines from the 160,000-member British Medical Association urge doctors to refer to expectant mothers as “pregnant people,” to “celebrate diversity” and not alienate members of the transgender community.

The new guidelines come with a 14-page booklet entitled, “A Guide to Effective Communication: Inclusive Language in the Workplace.”

How can excluding the most basic and cherished title in human society be “inclusive?” And how many so-called “pregnant men” are there in Britain? Well, one—who is a biological woman! In other words, a mother.

Folks, words matter. No matter what our profession, we ought to simply refuse this kind of language. If motherhood isn’t safe from political correctness, nothing is.

Resources


Comment Policy: Commenters are welcome to argue all points of view, but they are asked to do it civilly and respectfully. Comments that call names, insult other people or groups, use profanity or obscenity, repeat the same points over and over, or make personal remarks about other commenters will be deleted. After multiple infractions, commenters may be banned.

  • Steve

    Words do matter. Anyone who is interested in exploring this further should follow the fight that Dr. Jordan B Peterson has fought in Toronto against the bill in Ontario requiring the use of certain “gender pronouns.”